KB Cyber Consulting / Capability Index

Governance built for the way risk actually moves.

JavaScript is unavailable, so the interactive capability index is presented below as a complete static reference.

GRC Advisory

Business trigger: Risk work is active, but ownership is unclear.
Governance challenge: Programs become a collection of registers, meetings, and point-in-time reviews.
What KB Cyber does: Establishes a practical governance model, decision rights, and a risk rhythm leaders can use.
Typical deliverables: Governance charter, risk taxonomy, operating cadence, and executive reporting.
Relevant frameworks: NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and COBIT.
Intended outcome: A program that turns risk signals into accountable decisions.

Business trigger: Your vendor ecosystem is changing faster than its reviews.
Governance challenge: Questionnaires collect evidence without showing which relationships need attention first.
What KB Cyber does: Tier vendors, right-size due diligence, and build an ongoing review process.
Typical deliverables: Vendor inventory, tiering model, due diligence workflow, and remediation register.
Relevant frameworks: NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and SOC 2.
Intended outcome: Clear visibility into the third parties your business depends on.

Business trigger: Policies exist, but teams do not know what to do next.
Governance challenge: Documents drift from practice, ownership, and the controls they are meant to support.
What KB Cyber does: Connects policy intent to standards, owners, review cycles, and usable evidence.
Typical deliverables: Policy library, standards map, approval workflow, and review calendar.
Relevant frameworks: ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and CIS Controls.
Intended outcome: Policies that guide behavior and withstand scrutiny.

Business trigger: An audit or internal review is approaching.
Governance challenge: Evidence is scattered, control owners are uncertain, and findings arrive late.
What KB Cyber does: Assesses control design and operation, prioritizes gaps, and creates a defensible action plan.
Typical deliverables: Risk assessment, control test plan, findings register, and remediation roadmap.
Relevant frameworks: NIST 800-53, NIST CSF, and CIS Controls.
Intended outcome: A clearer path from identified gap to verified remediation.

Business trigger: A new requirement affects the way you collect, use, or protect data.
Governance challenge: Teams struggle to translate regulatory language into owned, testable work.
What KB Cyber does: Maps obligations to business processes and proportionate controls.
Typical deliverables: Obligation register, applicability assessment, control mapping, and evidence plan.
Relevant frameworks: HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI DSS.
Intended outcome: Compliance work that is connected to operating reality.

Business trigger: AI is already in use before oversight has caught up.
Governance challenge: The organization lacks an inventory, risk tiers, and clear decision owners.
What KB Cyber does: Builds a living AI inventory, classifies use cases, and establishes standards, oversight, and lifecycle reviews.
Typical deliverables: AI inventory, risk classification, policy set, control register, and oversight model.
Relevant frameworks: NIST AI RMF, NIST CSF, and ISO 27001.
Intended outcome: Responsible AI adoption with decisions and evidence you can explain.

Business trigger: Customers or leadership need a clearer view of control readiness.
Governance challenge: Readiness is mistaken for a last-minute document collection exercise.
What KB Cyber does: Assesses gaps, designs controls, prepares evidence, and plans remediation before an independent audit.
Typical deliverables: Readiness assessment, gap register, control design, evidence plan, and audit preparation.
Relevant frameworks: SOC 2, NIST CSF, and ISO 27001.
Intended outcome: A structured readiness path—not a guarantee of certification or audit success.